Monday 14 September 2015

Do God exist?

No He doesn't. The God you are looking for doesn't possibly exists. Your image about Him is somebody who will show up to you to prove His existence. Such a thing doesn't exist, we know that since it hasn't been like that(for many many times, atleast).

"Show me a number and I will show you God." said a believer on a social media site. Numbers exists but have you seen them in physical form? I can give you two carrots and one apple, it your logic that actually tells how many of them are. Nobody have actually seen numbers but still they believe in their existence, they actually use it and they are allowed to be entered in lives. Why doesn't has anyone actually questioned about the physical existence of numbers? Only a kid with not sufficient amount of logical reasoning and who is not able to digest the numbers and Mathematics can possibly question this. 

But you can argue that since the numbers are the creation of humans only, it can be equally possible for the case of God. We just create things for our own practical purposes. But was creating "1", "2", etc. affected the existence of 2 carrots and 1 apple. NO! Do the number of carrots and apples change for a kid with no knowledge about numbers, NO? Now we slowly begin to understand that it is not the numbers we created, but the manifestation of it. In order to use an entity, we have to build a concept around it. And that is what exactly is the manifestation. Now you can, at your utmost desire can ridicule almost every aspect of our number theory. There is no logic for the number "eight" to have only 5 letters. Why we write numbers as 1,2,3 and why not 1,11,111,etc.? Assigning a single digit to a number is illogical and is defying its own existence and meaning and hence it is wrong! Why do not constants have a unique perfect value on paper? These all stuff is pointless hence the numbers must not exist! But did you ever raise these questions?

Now we can realize that when we are ridiculing religious practices and traditions, we are actually ridiculing the manifestations about God. Claiming that the number theory is ridiculous is irrelevant to to the number of carrots and apples! Almost every type of Atheist principles are derived from the misinterpretation about the believer's interpretations about God. There is no need to explain that. For example, the very famous argument- "if God wants something, He would just have it, there is no reason for Him to create us and get His job done and hence God should not possibly exist." which simply puts forward this question- who told the argumenter that God could get anything He wants. This continues to disapprove each and every of the Atheist principles amazingly on the same grounds which Atheists themselves like to fight- insufficient data. In case you are wondering I don't know about it, I know MORE Atheism than you because I was practically an Atheist for a fairly long time without FAKING. I didn't sneak into praying halls when nobody was seeing, I made fun of all the people who went to temples and churches, I attempted to tear the photographs of various Gods and so on. I was literally a fanboy of a very idiotic(I realized it right now, though! :() group- Atheist Republic. 




This lovely parable is from "Your Sacred Self" by Dr. Wayne Dyer.

In a mother’s womb were two babies. One asked the other: “Do you believe in life after delivery?”The other replied, “Why, of course. There has to be something after delivery. Maybe we are here to prepare ourselves for what we will be later.”

“Nonsense” said the first. “There is no life after delivery. What kind of life would that be?”
The second said, “I don’t know, but there will be more light than here. Maybe we will walk with our legs and eat from our mouths. Maybe we will have other senses that we can’t understand now.”

The first replied, “That is absurd. Walking is impossible. And eating with our mouths? Ridiculous! The umbilical cord supplies nutrition and everything we need. But the umbilical cord is so short. Life after delivery is to be logically excluded.”

The second insisted, “Well I think there is something and maybe it’s different than it is here. Maybe we won’t need this physical cord anymore.”

The first replied, “Nonsense. And moreover if there is life, then why has no one has ever come back from there? Delivery is the end of life, and in the after-delivery there is nothing but darkness and silence and oblivion. It takes us nowhere.”

“Well, I don’t know,” said the second, “but certainly we will meet Mother and she will take care of us.”

The first replied “Mother? You actually believe in Mother? That’s laughable. If Mother exists then where is She now?”

The second said, “She is all around us. We are surrounded by her. We are of Her. It is in Her that we live. Without Her this world would not and could not exist.”

Said the first: “Well I don’t see Her, so it is only logical that She doesn’t exist.”To which the second replied, “Sometimes, when you’re in silence and you focus and  listen, you can perceive Her presence, and you can hear Her loving voice, calling down from above.”


This parable is just as amazing as it can get. Even if you still have doubts, watch this amazing masterpiece which will blow your mind-

Scientific Evidence of God

Do souls exist?


"The body works just the exact way it should be, even after assuming that the souls doesn't exists or possibly running the body" said a researcher possibly working on neuroscience. Yeah, lol. Neuroscience is the branch of science which has been proven the greatest enemy of the concept of soul. But how could the explanation of the working of an object defy the existence of somebody running it? This "We know how it works, hence there is no creator of it" concept is what basically has been employed here. While you are describing the working of the brain, you are describing the movement of neurons, the path of the brain cells which are responsible for our "consciousness", but who said that the matter cannot exist without a soul? They both are mutually exclusive and it is clearly described in all the religious texts, especially in Bhagwad Geeta and many Buddhists philosophies. So this concepts are again described from the misconception of concepts. 

"Soul does not exists" You even require consciousness to realize this statement. If neurons are bringing them to you, who is actually making neurons to do so? If body is working without a soul,why haven't they have already formed a human body when they already had successfully generated human tissues? If soul doesn't exists why we cannot create energy and only use it one form or another?


And again, there are innumerable examples from the ancient practices like worshiping nine planets, mentioning the exact distance between earth and Sun, the components of the bed rock which the humans of those times couldn't possibly know. I have till now only touched modern concepts.

 I followed the path of Agnosticism for most of my life. The logical principles held by Atheists did fascinate me but it is ultimately foolish because it is written very very earlier that the presence of God is in itself irrational so how can His existence be tested or proved on rational and logical grounds? Also their theory on evolution is entirely bullshit. It has been time and again proven that many things in our own body and almost entire organism on our planet are all interlinked with each other such that it was not at all possible for one to exist without the another, so in order for them to come into existence they must have been created AT THE SAME TIME. 

A fast fact, when your body is about to vomit, 10-15 seconds earlier your mouth is filled by saliva so that when you are vomiting, the harmful acids won't harm your delicate mouth tissues. What are the chances for a mechanism of this stature possibly happen by accident? There are endless such examples about the amazing working of our body and for the disapproval of the fact that everything is mutually exclusive which is beautifully described in the video. Check out the history, the ones who pioneered the field in science and medical were as such as equally a believer, the ones that didn't believe were either philosophical orators to whom nobody paid a heed to, until their death or some stupid scientists who all their lives worked under under the believers thinking that nobody supreme than themselves exists(Well yeah it was a bit exaggeration, sorry. It is not meant to be fully believed) or simply the ones who knew nothing about science and barked till Hell that science should be given time. Because the one who saw the working of amazingly complex yet delicate nature was completely amazed and couldn't help but believe in an intelligent creator behind everything. 

I had spent around two months thinking only about these stuffs and if I were to write everything I thought in this period of time, it will result in a book. I will keep updating this post, though. It is for you to enjoy and wonder :)

So the answer to the above question is that there are 100% chances for God to exist but we aren't meant to understand Him because if we were we would have been already, long long ago. Furthermore, if we were to understand God and all his ideologies and wisdom, we would become God ourselves. 

"God exists but not for the reasons you think of".

So the correct path to life doesn't lie in finding God but lies in finding God within oneself. Here is a picture of a Buddhist monk FEEDING a tiger-



Share:

Featured post

Philosophers I love- Lao Tzu

You cannot discuss Chinese literature without discussing Lao Tzu. A great philosopher and founder of Taoism, one of the important tradition ...